I am a fan of cheap, knock-off brand snacks from the Dollar Store.
The Dollar Store food aisle exists separately from the rest of reality. Everything is something slightly different, like distorted, discounted images in a mirror-world; Funyons are "Onion Salty O's!," Teddy Grahams are "Funny Bear Crackers," Oreos are "Choco-Delicious Cookie Sandwiches." If you've ever been to Japan, the English they use on public advertisements tend to be slightly off, slightly askew. It may not necessarily be blatantly incorrect, but even the most novice of print editors will immediately realize that they're not dealing with fluent English-speakers here. The problem is word arrangement; subordinate clauses don't have independent clauses, syntax is backwards, nouns and pronouns and adjectives and verbs are forced to fit together uncomfortably, like pesky jigsaw puzzle pieces that don't interlock. Yeah, it's kind of like Japan.
The brand names don't have the prestige of a Keebler or a Nabisco, don't roll off the tongue as gracefully or melodically. Instead, they bear names that are short-sighted and poorly-worded, like Fungoid Farms or Faggo Brand Soda. I assume these particular brand names were chosen to be deliberately funny, or simply because they didn't expect the company to last very long.
Characters adorning the outer packaging would look ridiculously out of place on the pristine shelves of any national mega-chain supermarket, but look remarkably organic and natural on the dilapidated shelves of the Dollar Store. There's a flamingo wearing a cowboy hat and a hula skirt; a rhinoceros on a skateboard with a "Cowabunga!" word bubble; a pink-and-purple polka-dotted Gorilla giving us the thumbs up. Something so absurd wouldn't fly anywhere else; yet at the Dollar Store, it somehow makes perfect sense. Anything other than this would seem unreasonable.
Two of my favorite Dollar Store snacks are their versions of "Doritos" and the "Nilla Wafers:"
The phony Nacho Cheese Tortilla Chips are almost nearly the genuine article. If you poured it into a bowl and destroyed the evidence of the bag, you probably wouldn't give them a second thought. They look like Doritos. But they don't taste like Doritos, not exactly. They taste a little...odd; but definitely NOT bad. In fact, sometimes I even prefer them to the real thing. There's something distinctly peculiar about their flavor, something that's neither delicious nor nauseating, but more along the lines of intriguing. I imagine it's the way normal Doritos would taste if they had almost every single ingredient (the vegetable oil, ground up corn meal, salt, nacho cheese powder, etc.) but unexpectedly ran out of the super-secret ingredient, the x-factor that only the heirs of the Frito-Lays fortune is privy to. That's how these taste, like reject chips, like almost-Doritos. And yet, I can't stress this enough: I do like eating them. It's like eating an exotic new brand of chips that were brought home from a Third World vacation.
Now, the interesting thing about the bootleg vanilla wafers is that I actually consider them better than the famous name-brand 'Nilla Wafers. Sure, the latter has the instantly-recognizable bright yellow box, a beacon of reassurance that this is safe to eat and there are no spider eggs hidden inside. But aside from that, I've always thought they were overrated. I guess they're alright if you mix them in with banana pudding, but they too dry and gritty. That's my biggest problem with them, they might as well be made of sand. By comparison, the Dollar Store brand -- I usually have a box of them lying around the house, but I'm fresh out. I know that they come in a red, white, & blue box, and the brand logo is a picture of a wheat stalk. I always get them from the Dollar Tree -- don't have that sandy consistency. They're firmer when you bite into them, sturdier. They always taste stale, as if you forgot to Chip-Clip them and left them sitting overnight. But it's absolutely a pleasing kind of stale, if there is such a thing. It's preferable. And their better at soaking up milk when you dunk them. I don't know, it's hard to describe (and even harder to imagine, I'm sure) if you haven't tried them, but they really are just better. It's like some weird inverse effect, the reason why I like them is a direct result of it being of lower quality.
Of course, Dollar Stores also have name-brand food. The best value is their candy aisle; you can get legit candy -- Snickers, Kit-Kats, Nerds, Reese's peanut butter cups, all of that -- for dirt cheap. But there's something less fun about that. You'll eagerly buy it and eat it. It'll taste just as good, if not infinitely better, than anything else you could get there. But it's less exciting, less thrilling somehow. There's no kitsch value to it. That 3 Musketeers bar just doesn't feel special because you know there are a thousand more where that came from. It's no different than going clothes-shopping at a Thrift Store -- the Lacoste polo might be a steal, but the Little League baseball jersey is a deal. There's nothing wrong with buying real food from the Dollar Store, it's just kind of missing the point.
There's a certain sense of irony that comes with visiting a Dollar Store. The same kind of shallow, self-aware irony that comes with wearing a t-shirt from a high school you didn't attend, and in a year you didn't graduate (Go Vikings! Class of '94!). Shopping regularly at the Dollar Store is like an inside joke with yourself, it's funny because you don't have to be there, and even funnier because you know you have the means and the resources to stop by Whole Foods immediately after. I like to pretend that I'm a poor person, that my Burger King paycheck is all used up, my Food Stamps are all gone, and now I have to feed my eight kids and my baby momma for the next two weeks on nothing more than $7.00. It's a fun game in a perverse, mean-spirited sort of way. For the single mother that has to feed her children on imitation Cheez-its, there are feelings of shame and embarrassment. But for me, just some guy looking for something to snack on, there are feelings of profound wonder and curiosity.
Ultimately, the beauty of the Dollar Store is that things are different, but definitely not too different. It's all still vaguely familiar. It's different enough to pique your interest, but not enough to scare you away. Everything is just slightly off center, making you realize you've stepped into a strange and wonderful place.
And all of this is for only $1.00. I would gladly pay $2.00.
Monday, June 30, 2008
Sunday, June 29, 2008
What I Had For Dinner 6/29/09
Retired Players I Loved To Watch #12 (He's the one on the right)
Muggsy Bogues
The one thing everyone knows about Muggsy is that he was the smallest player in NBA history. Standing at only 5'3," I'm a full five inches taller than him.
But that's beside the point. I think that little bit of useless trivia detracts from the great player that he was for well over a dozen years. Sure, it's impressive that such a short person was able to establish himself so well in such a tall game. But it's important to realize that Bogues wasn't noteworthy BECAUSE of his height, but DESPITE his height.
Throughout the 1990s, he was one of the greatest playmaking point guards in the league. For a good seven straight years, he maintained an average of about 9 assists per game. That's a staggering statistic. He was like a quarterback on the hardwood, he had that innate ability to constantly find the open man. Lots of players can platoon at the point guard position, competent enough to bring the ball upcourt, not turn it over, and occasionally make the right pass; in other words, they're good enough not to mess up too often. But Bogues was like a conductor of the offense, almost telepathically controlling how the other nine players around him -- both teammates and opponents alike -- moved on the court. Similar to the way Jason Kidd or Chris Paul or Deron Williams does it today, he's almost able to will the ball into tight spots, threading passes into angles that don't exist. That's the testament to a truly great point guard, making assists appear out of thin air, as if by magic. Pulling plays out of your butt, basically. That's something you really can't teach. With enough practice, I suppose players can get better at passing the ball. But they really can't learn how to become transcendent at it. You either have it or don't; it's a cliche because it's true.
He had his weaknesses -- poor long range shooter, got a lot of lay-up attempts stuffed at the rim, poor man-to-man defender -- but his unique combination of speed, vision, and leadership made up for any inherent, diminutive shortcomings. I was in a constant state of disbelief while watching him play; he just did things that someone of his size shouldn't be able to do.
And those teal, pin-striped Hornets jerseys were fresh as hell.
Muggsy Bogues career statistics
What I Had For Breakfast 6/29/08
Saturday, June 28, 2008
What I Had For Dinner 6/28/08
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Party Shuffle (I've been negligent of my blog)
I haven't posted anything worthwhile in days, so I'll take the extra time to post the first 20 (that's 5 more than usual!) shuffled songs that come up on my iTunes. And yeah, no skipping.
"Tutti Frutti"
Little Richard
Here's Little Richard
It's too bad this song was released in old fuddy duddy 1955, because the original, uncensored chorus lyrics to this song are classic:
"A-wop-bop-a-loo-mop, a good goddam! / Tutti Frutti, loose booty / If it don't fit, don't force it / You can grease it, make it easy"
Haha.
"I Melt With You"
Saves the Day
I'm Sorry I'm Leaving
It's a relatively safe, innocuous cover of a safe, innocuous Modern English tune, but I still really like it. There's just something endearing about the acoustic guitars and Chris Conley's young, still-cracking voice.
"Needy Girl"
Chromeo
She's In Control
"When you're home alone / You don't answer the phone / Alright...Ah-ah-ah-alright"
I got a kick out of seeing this one come up. Chromeo's great because there's no pretense in their music; they're only interested in showing you a good time. Everything about this track -- right down to the nostalgic B-Boy scratching that kicks in at about the 2:40 mark -- is unapologetically fun. They're kind of a joke, but the joke isn't at THEIR expense so much as it is to all of OUR benefit. I like that, that's cool.
And the beats are amazing.
"Earth Angel"
The Penguins
The Best of the Penguins: The Mercury Years
I love the "jumpy" piano and the simple-but-determined chord progressions. There's a reason why this has been covered a thousand times -- it's a very solid song.
But I think its true importance, be it musically or culturally or whatever, will forever be its association with Back to the Future. It immediately reminds me of the scene at the Enchantment Under the Sea dance when Marty is forced to stand in with the backing band to make sure his parents kiss, which will then ensure that he'll still exist in 1985. It was a close call too, because as they neared the end of the song, his hand was already starting to disappear.
And I don't want to stray too far on a tangent, but on the subject of time-traveling paradoxes, I would argue that Marty McFly should have immediately ceased to exist the second he pushed his father out of the way of his grandfather's car. In that split second, that should've been it for him.
"Mansard Roof"
Vampire Weekend
Vampire Weekend
I totally bought into the internet hype, and with good reason. They're a catchy, snappy band. They incorporate infectious African beats with bright, chiming Johnny Marr-ish guitars. The total instrumentation on this album are expansive and mature -- on top of the typical stuff (guitar, bass, drums, blah blah blah), there's also keyboards, hand drums, harpsichords, strings, organs, flutes. And to top it off, they're hyper-literate. There's very little about them I don't like.
Regarding this track in particular, I'm very fond of the term "salty" (for example, in the line "I see a salty message in the eves"), so I was glad to see them work it into the song. It's definitely not used enough in everyday, casual conversation.
I also love the syncopation that opens the song: the keyboards come down very pronounced on beats 1-2-3, then immediately after, it's 1...pause...1-2-3-4.
"1999"
Prince
1999
With the new year a scant six months away, it'd be nice to see a revival of this song. So tonight I'm gonna party like it's...2009.
"1976"
RJD2
Since We Last Spoke
Haha. Two songs in a row with numerical titles, couldn't have planned that anymore perfect.
This is just a plain awesome track; it hits its maximum freshness threshold at the :38 mark when the horn section comes in.
"Clan in Da Front"
Wu-Tang
Enter the Wu-Tang (36 Chambers)
The thing I've always appreciated the most about Wu-Tang is the overwhelming amount of individual talent in the group. So if there was any complaint I have about this track -- and I'm stretching for criticism here because I still really do like it -- is that it doesn't have the diversity of, say, a "Killer Bees" or a "Protect Ya Neck" or any other typical Wu-Tang track that has multiple MCs on multiple verses. On "Clan in Da Front" -- even the song title is ironic, because the whole clan isn't even featured here -- there isn't any Ghosface, GZA, Meth, ODB, Raekwon, Inspectah Deck, not even so much as an uttered syllable out of U-God; it's all just RZA by his lonesome. And that in and of itself definitely isn't a bad thing, it's just I really like hearing the interplay of each member bouncing verses off each other. All of the different voices, tempos, and inflections collaborating with (and competing against) each other is when Wu-Tang is at its most provocative.
There's nothing particularly ambitious or unconventional about this song's lyrics (it follows a very typical A-A-B-B- rhyme scheme), but it's entirely satisfying because of its simplicity. Every down beat has another perfectly-matching down beat. Everything fits together, neatly and conclusively. You don't have to worry about RZA not letting the other shoe drop, because he always does. "Your motherfucking own" rhymes with "microphone," "pass the bone" rhymes with "Indiana Jones," and all is right with the world. It's very fulfilling in that way.
"Devoted to You"
The Everly Brothers
All-Time Original Hits
It's sappy sweet and squeaky clean (indicative of the times, of course), but I find something incredibly sincere about the way they sing the lines, "Darling, you can count on me / 'Till the sun dries up the sea / Until then I'll always be / Devoooted to Youuu."
It's no "Bye Bye Love," but it's still an OK song.
"Walk Like An Egyptian"
The Bangles
Different Light
"Whey-oh-whey-oh, whey-oh-whey-ooooooh"
"Keep Fishin'"
Weezer
Maladroit
One of the few highlights of an otherwise abysmal album.
Over the course of his career, Cuomo really has become a master at crafting the perfect 2 1/2 minute pop song: they're safe, harmless, vaguely-generic, and entirely enjoyable. Consider the lines "You'll never be / A better kind / If you don't leave / The world behind." That doesn't say anything...it doesn't even attempt to say anything. It's just inane blather whose only purpose is to fill two bars of sheet music. But you're able to forgive its complete lack of purpose just because it's so aesthetically pleasing.
And I also really like the booming, hollow-sounding drums on this track.
"And Your Bird Can Sing"
The Beatles
The Beatles Anthology [Disc 1]
The great thing about this track -- aside from being a very good song off of Revolver -- is that John, Paul, and George can't stop laughing throughout the entire track. I'm sure it was around this point in their careers that they really started to resent each other, so it's nice to hear them having a good time with each other in the studio.
That, and they must be blazed out of their minds.
"Big Poppa"
The Notorious B.I.G.
Ready to Die
Diddy's spoken-word verse towards the end is almost enough to ruin the entire song for me:
"Honey, check it / Tell your friends, to get with my friends / And we can be friends / Shit, we can do this every weekend / 'Aight? Is that 'aight with you? / Yeah...keep banging"
It makes me cringe every time. haha
"99 Red Balloons"
Goldfinger
Stomping Ground
I know that for fun, many Spanish teachers will take a day out of their lesson plan to teach students how to sing "La Bamba" or "Besame Mucho." So I wonder if German teachers do the same with this song...?
"Good Life"
Kanye West (feat. T-Pain)
Graduation
I love the cover art for this album. I want to buy it on vinyl and frame the cover sleeve.
"Psycho Killer"
Talking Heads
Talking Heads: 77
I haven't heard any Talking Heads in forever.
"Psycho killer / Quest que cest / Fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa far away"
That's my favorite part. I had to look the lyrics up to make sure I had enough "fa"s in there. Apparently there's nine, with the complete "far" coming on the tenth syllable.
"There She Goes"
Sixpence None The Richer
Sixpence None The Richer
I dunno, I've always liked this track way more than "Kiss Me." Surely I'm not alone, right?
"Sentimental Heart"
She & Him
Volume One
I just uploaded this album recently, so this is actually my first listen of this song. It's good, I like it enough. I just have one small complaint: I'm not sure how gripping she is as a performer. Aside from being an entirely competent singer, I don't know if there's anything else that's inherently fascinating or irresistible about her voice. She obviously has the singing chops, but I don't think there's any specific reason -- that is, any reason other than her simply being Zooey Deschanel -- to force me to listen to this album. Meh, who knows, maybe it just needs to grow on me longer...
However, I do like that she covered Smokey Robinson's "You Really Got A Hold On Me." It's not half as good as the original, but it doesn't matter because I appreciate the attempt.
"Canon in D Major"
Johann Pachelbel
The Most Relaxing Classical Music in the Universe
For any former band kid -- and I say band "kid" intentionally, because I don't think I showed nearly enough due diligence in practicing my scales to officially call myself a band "geek" -- this song holds a lot of sentimental value. For a lot of us, it was one of the first classical compositions we learned to play, and at that age, if something is "classical" than it naturally must also be extremely complex and difficult. Our parents were very impressed at recital time.
And I have plenty other versions of this (piano, acoustic guitar, electric guitar, full orchestra), but this is probably my favorite version -- just plain strings.
And check out the title of this album. That's a pretty lofty promise.
"Lust for Life"
Iggy Pop
Lust for Life
"Choose Life. Choose a job. Choose a career. Choose a family. Choose a fucking big television, choose washing machines, cars, compact disc players and electrical tin openers. Choose good health, low cholesterol, and dental insurance. Choose fixed interest mortgage repayments. Choose a starter home. Choose your friends. Choose leisurewear and matching luggage. Choose a three-piece suite on hire purchase in a range of fucking fabrics. Choose DIY and wondering who the fuck you are on Sunday morning. Choose sitting on that couch watching mind-numbing, spirit-crushing game shows, stuffing fucking junk food into your mouth. Choose rotting away at the end of it all, pissing your last in a miserable home, nothing more than an embarrassment to the selfish, fucked up brats you spawned to replace yourselves. Choose your future. Choose life... But why would I want to do a thing like that? I chose not to choose life. I chose somethin' else. And the reasons? There are no reasons. Who needs reasons when you've got heroin?"
This has long since ceased being an Iggy Pop song; now it's a Trainspotting song.
Oh, and a Carnival Cruise line song, too.
"Tutti Frutti"
Little Richard
Here's Little Richard
It's too bad this song was released in old fuddy duddy 1955, because the original, uncensored chorus lyrics to this song are classic:
"A-wop-bop-a-loo-mop, a good goddam! / Tutti Frutti, loose booty / If it don't fit, don't force it / You can grease it, make it easy"
Haha.
"I Melt With You"
Saves the Day
I'm Sorry I'm Leaving
It's a relatively safe, innocuous cover of a safe, innocuous Modern English tune, but I still really like it. There's just something endearing about the acoustic guitars and Chris Conley's young, still-cracking voice.
"Needy Girl"
Chromeo
She's In Control
"When you're home alone / You don't answer the phone / Alright...Ah-ah-ah-alright"
I got a kick out of seeing this one come up. Chromeo's great because there's no pretense in their music; they're only interested in showing you a good time. Everything about this track -- right down to the nostalgic B-Boy scratching that kicks in at about the 2:40 mark -- is unapologetically fun. They're kind of a joke, but the joke isn't at THEIR expense so much as it is to all of OUR benefit. I like that, that's cool.
And the beats are amazing.
"Earth Angel"
The Penguins
The Best of the Penguins: The Mercury Years
I love the "jumpy" piano and the simple-but-determined chord progressions. There's a reason why this has been covered a thousand times -- it's a very solid song.
But I think its true importance, be it musically or culturally or whatever, will forever be its association with Back to the Future. It immediately reminds me of the scene at the Enchantment Under the Sea dance when Marty is forced to stand in with the backing band to make sure his parents kiss, which will then ensure that he'll still exist in 1985. It was a close call too, because as they neared the end of the song, his hand was already starting to disappear.
And I don't want to stray too far on a tangent, but on the subject of time-traveling paradoxes, I would argue that Marty McFly should have immediately ceased to exist the second he pushed his father out of the way of his grandfather's car. In that split second, that should've been it for him.
"Mansard Roof"
Vampire Weekend
Vampire Weekend
I totally bought into the internet hype, and with good reason. They're a catchy, snappy band. They incorporate infectious African beats with bright, chiming Johnny Marr-ish guitars. The total instrumentation on this album are expansive and mature -- on top of the typical stuff (guitar, bass, drums, blah blah blah), there's also keyboards, hand drums, harpsichords, strings, organs, flutes. And to top it off, they're hyper-literate. There's very little about them I don't like.
Regarding this track in particular, I'm very fond of the term "salty" (for example, in the line "I see a salty message in the eves"), so I was glad to see them work it into the song. It's definitely not used enough in everyday, casual conversation.
I also love the syncopation that opens the song: the keyboards come down very pronounced on beats 1-2-3, then immediately after, it's 1...pause...1-2-3-4.
"1999"
Prince
1999
With the new year a scant six months away, it'd be nice to see a revival of this song. So tonight I'm gonna party like it's...2009.
"1976"
RJD2
Since We Last Spoke
Haha. Two songs in a row with numerical titles, couldn't have planned that anymore perfect.
This is just a plain awesome track; it hits its maximum freshness threshold at the :38 mark when the horn section comes in.
"Clan in Da Front"
Wu-Tang
Enter the Wu-Tang (36 Chambers)
The thing I've always appreciated the most about Wu-Tang is the overwhelming amount of individual talent in the group. So if there was any complaint I have about this track -- and I'm stretching for criticism here because I still really do like it -- is that it doesn't have the diversity of, say, a "Killer Bees" or a "Protect Ya Neck" or any other typical Wu-Tang track that has multiple MCs on multiple verses. On "Clan in Da Front" -- even the song title is ironic, because the whole clan isn't even featured here -- there isn't any Ghosface, GZA, Meth, ODB, Raekwon, Inspectah Deck, not even so much as an uttered syllable out of U-God; it's all just RZA by his lonesome. And that in and of itself definitely isn't a bad thing, it's just I really like hearing the interplay of each member bouncing verses off each other. All of the different voices, tempos, and inflections collaborating with (and competing against) each other is when Wu-Tang is at its most provocative.
There's nothing particularly ambitious or unconventional about this song's lyrics (it follows a very typical A-A-B-B- rhyme scheme), but it's entirely satisfying because of its simplicity. Every down beat has another perfectly-matching down beat. Everything fits together, neatly and conclusively. You don't have to worry about RZA not letting the other shoe drop, because he always does. "Your motherfucking own" rhymes with "microphone," "pass the bone" rhymes with "Indiana Jones," and all is right with the world. It's very fulfilling in that way.
"Devoted to You"
The Everly Brothers
All-Time Original Hits
It's sappy sweet and squeaky clean (indicative of the times, of course), but I find something incredibly sincere about the way they sing the lines, "Darling, you can count on me / 'Till the sun dries up the sea / Until then I'll always be / Devoooted to Youuu."
It's no "Bye Bye Love," but it's still an OK song.
"Walk Like An Egyptian"
The Bangles
Different Light
"Whey-oh-whey-oh, whey-oh-whey-ooooooh"
"Keep Fishin'"
Weezer
Maladroit
One of the few highlights of an otherwise abysmal album.
Over the course of his career, Cuomo really has become a master at crafting the perfect 2 1/2 minute pop song: they're safe, harmless, vaguely-generic, and entirely enjoyable. Consider the lines "You'll never be / A better kind / If you don't leave / The world behind." That doesn't say anything...it doesn't even attempt to say anything. It's just inane blather whose only purpose is to fill two bars of sheet music. But you're able to forgive its complete lack of purpose just because it's so aesthetically pleasing.
And I also really like the booming, hollow-sounding drums on this track.
"And Your Bird Can Sing"
The Beatles
The Beatles Anthology [Disc 1]
The great thing about this track -- aside from being a very good song off of Revolver -- is that John, Paul, and George can't stop laughing throughout the entire track. I'm sure it was around this point in their careers that they really started to resent each other, so it's nice to hear them having a good time with each other in the studio.
That, and they must be blazed out of their minds.
"Big Poppa"
The Notorious B.I.G.
Ready to Die
Diddy's spoken-word verse towards the end is almost enough to ruin the entire song for me:
"Honey, check it / Tell your friends, to get with my friends / And we can be friends / Shit, we can do this every weekend / 'Aight? Is that 'aight with you? / Yeah...keep banging"
It makes me cringe every time. haha
"99 Red Balloons"
Goldfinger
Stomping Ground
I know that for fun, many Spanish teachers will take a day out of their lesson plan to teach students how to sing "La Bamba" or "Besame Mucho." So I wonder if German teachers do the same with this song...?
"Good Life"
Kanye West (feat. T-Pain)
Graduation
I love the cover art for this album. I want to buy it on vinyl and frame the cover sleeve.
"Psycho Killer"
Talking Heads
Talking Heads: 77
I haven't heard any Talking Heads in forever.
"Psycho killer / Quest que cest / Fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa far away"
That's my favorite part. I had to look the lyrics up to make sure I had enough "fa"s in there. Apparently there's nine, with the complete "far" coming on the tenth syllable.
"There She Goes"
Sixpence None The Richer
Sixpence None The Richer
I dunno, I've always liked this track way more than "Kiss Me." Surely I'm not alone, right?
"Sentimental Heart"
She & Him
Volume One
I just uploaded this album recently, so this is actually my first listen of this song. It's good, I like it enough. I just have one small complaint: I'm not sure how gripping she is as a performer. Aside from being an entirely competent singer, I don't know if there's anything else that's inherently fascinating or irresistible about her voice. She obviously has the singing chops, but I don't think there's any specific reason -- that is, any reason other than her simply being Zooey Deschanel -- to force me to listen to this album. Meh, who knows, maybe it just needs to grow on me longer...
However, I do like that she covered Smokey Robinson's "You Really Got A Hold On Me." It's not half as good as the original, but it doesn't matter because I appreciate the attempt.
"Canon in D Major"
Johann Pachelbel
The Most Relaxing Classical Music in the Universe
For any former band kid -- and I say band "kid" intentionally, because I don't think I showed nearly enough due diligence in practicing my scales to officially call myself a band "geek" -- this song holds a lot of sentimental value. For a lot of us, it was one of the first classical compositions we learned to play, and at that age, if something is "classical" than it naturally must also be extremely complex and difficult. Our parents were very impressed at recital time.
And I have plenty other versions of this (piano, acoustic guitar, electric guitar, full orchestra), but this is probably my favorite version -- just plain strings.
And check out the title of this album. That's a pretty lofty promise.
"Lust for Life"
Iggy Pop
Lust for Life
"Choose Life. Choose a job. Choose a career. Choose a family. Choose a fucking big television, choose washing machines, cars, compact disc players and electrical tin openers. Choose good health, low cholesterol, and dental insurance. Choose fixed interest mortgage repayments. Choose a starter home. Choose your friends. Choose leisurewear and matching luggage. Choose a three-piece suite on hire purchase in a range of fucking fabrics. Choose DIY and wondering who the fuck you are on Sunday morning. Choose sitting on that couch watching mind-numbing, spirit-crushing game shows, stuffing fucking junk food into your mouth. Choose rotting away at the end of it all, pissing your last in a miserable home, nothing more than an embarrassment to the selfish, fucked up brats you spawned to replace yourselves. Choose your future. Choose life... But why would I want to do a thing like that? I chose not to choose life. I chose somethin' else. And the reasons? There are no reasons. Who needs reasons when you've got heroin?"
This has long since ceased being an Iggy Pop song; now it's a Trainspotting song.
Oh, and a Carnival Cruise line song, too.
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
What I Had For Breakfast 6/25/08
Scrambled eggs with toast.
Maybe I should've added a little bit of milk to make them softer and silkier (they came out a little on the dry side), but I've been in the mood for scrambled eggs for a while now, so I enjoyed them fine. And this was the first time in days that I woke up early enough -- I don't normally make a habit of sleeping in, but I've been really bad about it lately -- so it was nice to be able to cook a real breakfast.
Maybe I should've added a little bit of milk to make them softer and silkier (they came out a little on the dry side), but I've been in the mood for scrambled eggs for a while now, so I enjoyed them fine. And this was the first time in days that I woke up early enough -- I don't normally make a habit of sleeping in, but I've been really bad about it lately -- so it was nice to be able to cook a real breakfast.
Sunday, June 22, 2008
What I Had For Dinner 6/22/08
General Tso's Chicken.
The ultimate microcosm of Chinese-American dining. About the only way this dish could become any more Westernized is if they put a slice of bologna on top and had it served to you by the Marlboro Man himself. But food-elitism aside, it was good, as it almost always is; General Tso is nothing if not consistent.
The ultimate microcosm of Chinese-American dining. About the only way this dish could become any more Westernized is if they put a slice of bologna on top and had it served to you by the Marlboro Man himself. But food-elitism aside, it was good, as it almost always is; General Tso is nothing if not consistent.
Saturday, June 21, 2008
The Devastating Consequences of Literacy
I am a sentimental reader.
Not in the sense that sad stories make me sad, because that's a given for almost anyone that has at least half a heart.
I'm talking more along the lines of being sincerely bummed out as I near the end of a book. Each completed chapter is a sobering reminder that all good literature must come to an end. The stack of pages on the left grow thicker while the stack of pages on the right grow thinner; and for that, I am sorrowful. It's as if I feel guilty for doing exactly what the author intended me to do -- finish reading his work.
Of course, this only applies to good books. If we're talking about Melville's Moby-Dick or Conrad's Lord Jim or Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales, then that stuff can't be over soon enough. If it were up to me, that stupid whale would've smashed up Captain Ahab and his crew a good 100 or so pages sooner. There is no remorse when those stories end. Good riddance to overrated, hard-to-sit-through rubbish.
But it's when the book is monumentally enjoyable -- like, for example, Hogg's The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner, or Card's Ender's Game, or Donleavy's The Ginger Man, or, in the specific dilemma that I find myself in right now, Sedaris's When You Are Engulfed in Flames -- that I hesitate to finish it. It feels like such a shame to end something so abruptly. Things are going so well, why stop now? I'm not interested in resolution; I just want to be perpetually entertained. I'll stare at the book, forlorn, regretful that it couldn't have an extra chapter or epilogue -- at my most desperate, I'd even settle for an index. In the same way that you try to prolong a really good first date by suggesting Starbucks after dinner (neither of you actually want coffee, but that's irrelevant; it's their continued company that you're after), I try to do the same with good books.
I'll hem and I'll haw, beat around the bush, do anything possible to fend off the inevitable. I'll slow down my pace to nearly a crawl, almost to the point that I'm reading backwards. I'll sit down to read, cover the span of three and a half pages and say, Okay, I think that's about enough for today. I am a connoisseur; I slowly savor every subordinate clause, every syllable, every punctuation mark, pausing at each individual one to appreciate its existence and, more importantly, the role they play in extending a piece of literature that tiny bit longer. I'll find mundane reasons to interrupt my reading, like getting up to check if I left the stove on or adjusting the temperature on the thermostat or taking out the garbage -- all tasks that I wouldn't have otherwise bothered with if I was at the beginning of the book.
My bookshelf is littered with abandoned novels that have bookmarks jutting straight out of their bindings, all of them conspicuously positioned towards the very last 3/4 of each book. All of them are sitting there, incomplete. I tell myself that though I may not know how these stories end, at least these endings are still available to me if I were ever so inclined. I have all of the finales of these books saved and hoarded, safely tucked away, protected from any would-be readers that may have the nerve to conclude them. Perhaps I think if I save them long enough, somehow they will accrue interest, growing in size the way money in a savings account would. I should consult my bank, ask them if my book pages will multiply exponentially if I lock them away in their vault for X amount of years. If that doesn't work, maybe I can count on Ernest Hemingway coming back from the grave (gunshot wound and all) and tack on a few extra chapters to the end of his novels, maybe take the Old Man out for another fishing trip.
And there's an inherent conflict of interest with this problem. I am a student of English Lit, it's my job to complete novels. If books aren't finished, papers can't be started (then subsequently handed in, graded, critiqued, and so on); that's just how it works. I have no choice but to quickly finish books, one after another, all rapid fire. It's a necessary evil. Considering my field of study, anything less than that kind of steady, assembly-line efficiency is counter-productive to what I'm trying to accomplish. It would be like if Kobiyashi felt a pang of guilt every time he reached the last bite of his hot dog -- it defeats the whole purpose of being a competitive eater. It's an eternal struggle between what the student in me needs to do and what the procrastinator in me wants to do.
I will put on a brave face and begrudgingly finish When You Are Engulfed in Flames now.
Not in the sense that sad stories make me sad, because that's a given for almost anyone that has at least half a heart.
I'm talking more along the lines of being sincerely bummed out as I near the end of a book. Each completed chapter is a sobering reminder that all good literature must come to an end. The stack of pages on the left grow thicker while the stack of pages on the right grow thinner; and for that, I am sorrowful. It's as if I feel guilty for doing exactly what the author intended me to do -- finish reading his work.
Of course, this only applies to good books. If we're talking about Melville's Moby-Dick or Conrad's Lord Jim or Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales, then that stuff can't be over soon enough. If it were up to me, that stupid whale would've smashed up Captain Ahab and his crew a good 100 or so pages sooner. There is no remorse when those stories end. Good riddance to overrated, hard-to-sit-through rubbish.
But it's when the book is monumentally enjoyable -- like, for example, Hogg's The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner, or Card's Ender's Game, or Donleavy's The Ginger Man, or, in the specific dilemma that I find myself in right now, Sedaris's When You Are Engulfed in Flames -- that I hesitate to finish it. It feels like such a shame to end something so abruptly. Things are going so well, why stop now? I'm not interested in resolution; I just want to be perpetually entertained. I'll stare at the book, forlorn, regretful that it couldn't have an extra chapter or epilogue -- at my most desperate, I'd even settle for an index. In the same way that you try to prolong a really good first date by suggesting Starbucks after dinner (neither of you actually want coffee, but that's irrelevant; it's their continued company that you're after), I try to do the same with good books.
I'll hem and I'll haw, beat around the bush, do anything possible to fend off the inevitable. I'll slow down my pace to nearly a crawl, almost to the point that I'm reading backwards. I'll sit down to read, cover the span of three and a half pages and say, Okay, I think that's about enough for today. I am a connoisseur; I slowly savor every subordinate clause, every syllable, every punctuation mark, pausing at each individual one to appreciate its existence and, more importantly, the role they play in extending a piece of literature that tiny bit longer. I'll find mundane reasons to interrupt my reading, like getting up to check if I left the stove on or adjusting the temperature on the thermostat or taking out the garbage -- all tasks that I wouldn't have otherwise bothered with if I was at the beginning of the book.
My bookshelf is littered with abandoned novels that have bookmarks jutting straight out of their bindings, all of them conspicuously positioned towards the very last 3/4 of each book. All of them are sitting there, incomplete. I tell myself that though I may not know how these stories end, at least these endings are still available to me if I were ever so inclined. I have all of the finales of these books saved and hoarded, safely tucked away, protected from any would-be readers that may have the nerve to conclude them. Perhaps I think if I save them long enough, somehow they will accrue interest, growing in size the way money in a savings account would. I should consult my bank, ask them if my book pages will multiply exponentially if I lock them away in their vault for X amount of years. If that doesn't work, maybe I can count on Ernest Hemingway coming back from the grave (gunshot wound and all) and tack on a few extra chapters to the end of his novels, maybe take the Old Man out for another fishing trip.
And there's an inherent conflict of interest with this problem. I am a student of English Lit, it's my job to complete novels. If books aren't finished, papers can't be started (then subsequently handed in, graded, critiqued, and so on); that's just how it works. I have no choice but to quickly finish books, one after another, all rapid fire. It's a necessary evil. Considering my field of study, anything less than that kind of steady, assembly-line efficiency is counter-productive to what I'm trying to accomplish. It would be like if Kobiyashi felt a pang of guilt every time he reached the last bite of his hot dog -- it defeats the whole purpose of being a competitive eater. It's an eternal struggle between what the student in me needs to do and what the procrastinator in me wants to do.
I will put on a brave face and begrudgingly finish When You Are Engulfed in Flames now.
Thursday, June 19, 2008
In Moratorium
I have realized that fresh new ideas have been harder to come by lately. I have tried to show some initiative in solving my writer's block by scouring news sites for interesting/outrageous/silly headlines that I could affix a few lines of witty/insightful/pithy commentary too. But now I've decided to take a passive-aggressive approach to said writer's block; instead of figuring out what I do want to write about, I'll figure out what I don't want to write about. This list will be comprised of talking points that I've already written about ad nauseam, that all relevancy has been thoroughly exhausted, that bore me. This seems like a good idea to me. Writing about things I don't want to write about successfully accomplishes my goal of taking up space -- like an optical illusion -- and ultimately, that's a means to an end. The beauty of it is, writing about old topics I'm sick of (but am also completely familiar with) still allows me to write about them, which is infinitely easier than writing about brand new topics that I may or may not know anything about. In one way or another, all of these points of interest have reached a stalemate; it is what it is and will continue to be so for the foreseeable future. Regardless of how clever I think I am, there's little need for me to continue stating the obvious. So these are some talking points that I am indefinitely banning from my blog, effective immediately.
Oil
Bush, McCain, and Gov. Crist each want to begin domestic drilling off the shores of Florida and California, post haste (read it here: Crist backs McCain on Florida drilling). Sure, go ahead, fine by me. That's because as far as I'm concerned, it's a non-story.
Even if they started drilling today (and that's highly unlikely, it's already 4:00 pm and the end of the business day is a mere one hour away), none of us would reap the benefit of this extra crude oil for a very long time...five years if you believe the optimists, and as many as 10 years if you believe the pessimists. It's not a quick-fix. It's a calculated risk that will possibly and hopefully pay off sometime in the distant future. It's akin to telling a terminally ill cancer patient that there will be a cure for cancer, but it's still a decade away. Sure, that's good...but not good enough. And that analogy may not even be that accurate, because any new oil reserves we might strike off our shores is hardly a "cure." More oil doesn't necessarily mean lower gas prices, but it certainly means more currency for OPEC to auction off to the highest bidder.
And I'm not a bleeding heart tree-hugger, so any contention (if you can even call it that, as I've already said that I don't have any pressing issue with mining off our coasts) I may have with these newest developments has nothing to do with any guilt over the well-being of our environment. Go ahead and punch a hole in the bottom of the ocean, no skin off of my back. They could even nuke some whales if they really wanted to, just as long as it somehow positively benefited my quality of living. So no, that isn't an issue for me. Instead, it's the lack of impact on the bottom line. It's a single drop in a very large bucket. For the most part, things will still remain unchanged.
Until the oil discussion -- Fox News is playing in the background and I've already heard them mention the word "oil" a dozen times. I'm tired of it already. -- moves in the direction of seriously supporting wide mass use of alternative sources of energy (ethanol, methanol, solar, wind, hydroelectricity, nuclear power), I don't feel very compelled to continue talking about it.
Barack Obama
I'm young. I'm a minority. I'm idealistic and starry-eyed. I'm over-educated in impractical studies. I'm vaguely liberal, vaguely pretentious, and vaguely indie-inclined. This is who I am. It should come as little surprise that I intend on voting for Obama. So continuing to affirm that my political affiliations lie squarely with him seem superfluous. I might as well blog about my fondness for LP records or Natalie Portman or slim fit jeans or Lord Byron or Morningstar Chik'n nuggets or anything else as equally and stereotypically obvious. I think my support for Obama is already understood.
Election 2008 isn't for another five months. Up until then, we're going to have a lot of the standard posturing, rhetoric, and mud-slinging that occurs anytime two men are vying for one position. In other words, lots of boring stuff. Until Obama names a Vice President, Michelle Obama hosts another episode of The View, or anything more-than-halfway newsworthy happens, I'm going make a concerted effort to keep Barack out of my blog. As is stands, I've said everything that needs to be said. We can give him a rest for now.
Oh, and considering his party's most recent botch-job (read it here: Muslim woman: Scarf kept her from seat near Obama) I'm not even in the mood to give him any free, positive publicity. During a televised rally in Detroit, Hebba Aref was denied a seat behind Obama because she wore a traditional Muslim head scarf. She was asked to step aside (and out of sight of camera lenses) because of how her appearance may be perceived by a "sensitive political climate." That's repulsive. That's a mockery of everything this campaign supposedly stands for. Suddenly all that talk of hope, change, and tolerance sounds like empty lip service. And I know this was no direct fault of Obama's -- his cronies were the ones to so tactlessly ask her to beat it -- but these campaign underlings are under HIS employ. And he is ultimately responsible for anything they do or say. He needs them to ship up or ship out. His name is "Barack Obama." We get that he's a Christian, but outside of legally changing it to "Micheal Smith," there's not much he can do to distance himself from the (partially) unfair stigma of Islam. I'm disappointed that he (or at the very least, those chosen to work for his party) are so easily swayed by peer pressure and guilt-by-association. It's like being ashamed to stand next to an overweight girl out of fear someone might mistake her for your girlfriend. It's petty and weak and paranoid and completely contradictive of everything they're trying to accomplish.
Michael Beasley and the NBA Draft
The NBA Draft is only a week away. Derrick Rose (the hometown Chicagoan) has already reportedly wowed the Bulls during his personal workout. Beasley is in Miami right now (read here: Michael Beasley coming today for workout), working out for the Heat. I say it's an open-and-shut case: the Bulls will take Rose #1 overall and we'll take Beasley #2 overall.
There isn't much more to say on the subject.
Those are the two best players available in the draft; we're the first two teams that select in the draft. Basic, undeniable logic tends to prevail every time.
For the next week, we're going to read about a lot of misdirection from team officials. General managers are going to say they really like Player A while secretly praying that they get Player B. This is what happens at this time of the year, it's just gamesmanship. Teams will do whatever it takes (misinformation, smoke screens, outright lying) to get who they want. When you're at the 11th hour, the only thing that could possibly happen next is whatever it is that you were waiting for all along. And that's where we're at with the NBA Draft. A lot of the later picks are still up in the air, but as a Heat fan, the only two that should matter, us and Chicago, are set. There's nothing left to do but actually draft Michael Beasley. So with that said, I won't type another word about him, not until he's a member of the Miami Heat. And then he can proceed to average 20 points, 10 rebounds, and win Rookie of the Year.
Gas prices
It's sort of become the non-talking point (read yet another gasoline article in today's Sun-Sentinel: Sales of premium gas plunge: 'Nobody can afford it'), something someone brings up to seem like they're up to date on current events, or perhaps just because they have sincerely run out of anything else to talk about. Fact is, gas prices are high. And they're going to get higher before they get lower. At this point, complaining about gas prices is about as effective as relevant as complaining about the chemical composition of water -- it's just become a fact of life now. If we want relief at the pumps, we'll have to actually do something to help ourselves. Take me for example; I drive the less-than-quarter-mile from my house to the local Publix; I drive out to go exercise, then drive all the way back; I drive my own car when meeting friends instead of car-pooling. I drive everywhere. I'm surprised I haven't driven to the mailbox yet. So rather than making the ineffective, offhand comment about gas prices being kind of high lately (no kidding), I can take an active role in fuel-consumption:
Walk whenever possible, or better yet, ride my bike. Change my air filters regularly, check my air pressure. Remove any heavy junk from trunk. Share driving responsibilities with friends, family, and coworkers, alternating for everyone's convenience. Buy a hybrid car. Run errands all at once, and in as close proximity to each other as possible. Instead of going out, enjoy a relaxing night at home.
We can't control OPEC's bureaucratic red tape, but we can control our daily routines. It's going to take an individual effort.
Not only should the subject of gas prices be barred from my blog, but from all casual conversation in general. It's become woefully unoriginal. I've realized that anyone who asks "what's the deal with gas these days?" isn't anyone worth speaking to. Out of all the other talking points, this one will be the easiest to abstain from.
So starting from here on out, I will no longer directly address these topics in my blog. Mum's the word. And this ban won't be permanent. Sooner or later, I will write about all of these topics again. But for the time being, I am retiring them. I don't feel I have anything else to add that won't be what I've already written about them, verbatim. Unless something really new and exciting happens, I'm done with that stuff. Consider them excommunicated. If all goes according to plan, these newly implemented blog guidelines will force me to come up with original thought.
Editor's Note: What I Had For Breakfast, What I Had For Lunch, and What I Had For Dinner will continue to be updated regularly.
Oil
Bush, McCain, and Gov. Crist each want to begin domestic drilling off the shores of Florida and California, post haste (read it here: Crist backs McCain on Florida drilling). Sure, go ahead, fine by me. That's because as far as I'm concerned, it's a non-story.
Even if they started drilling today (and that's highly unlikely, it's already 4:00 pm and the end of the business day is a mere one hour away), none of us would reap the benefit of this extra crude oil for a very long time...five years if you believe the optimists, and as many as 10 years if you believe the pessimists. It's not a quick-fix. It's a calculated risk that will possibly and hopefully pay off sometime in the distant future. It's akin to telling a terminally ill cancer patient that there will be a cure for cancer, but it's still a decade away. Sure, that's good...but not good enough. And that analogy may not even be that accurate, because any new oil reserves we might strike off our shores is hardly a "cure." More oil doesn't necessarily mean lower gas prices, but it certainly means more currency for OPEC to auction off to the highest bidder.
And I'm not a bleeding heart tree-hugger, so any contention (if you can even call it that, as I've already said that I don't have any pressing issue with mining off our coasts) I may have with these newest developments has nothing to do with any guilt over the well-being of our environment. Go ahead and punch a hole in the bottom of the ocean, no skin off of my back. They could even nuke some whales if they really wanted to, just as long as it somehow positively benefited my quality of living. So no, that isn't an issue for me. Instead, it's the lack of impact on the bottom line. It's a single drop in a very large bucket. For the most part, things will still remain unchanged.
Until the oil discussion -- Fox News is playing in the background and I've already heard them mention the word "oil" a dozen times. I'm tired of it already. -- moves in the direction of seriously supporting wide mass use of alternative sources of energy (ethanol, methanol, solar, wind, hydroelectricity, nuclear power), I don't feel very compelled to continue talking about it.
Barack Obama
I'm young. I'm a minority. I'm idealistic and starry-eyed. I'm over-educated in impractical studies. I'm vaguely liberal, vaguely pretentious, and vaguely indie-inclined. This is who I am. It should come as little surprise that I intend on voting for Obama. So continuing to affirm that my political affiliations lie squarely with him seem superfluous. I might as well blog about my fondness for LP records or Natalie Portman or slim fit jeans or Lord Byron or Morningstar Chik'n nuggets or anything else as equally and stereotypically obvious. I think my support for Obama is already understood.
Election 2008 isn't for another five months. Up until then, we're going to have a lot of the standard posturing, rhetoric, and mud-slinging that occurs anytime two men are vying for one position. In other words, lots of boring stuff. Until Obama names a Vice President, Michelle Obama hosts another episode of The View, or anything more-than-halfway newsworthy happens, I'm going make a concerted effort to keep Barack out of my blog. As is stands, I've said everything that needs to be said. We can give him a rest for now.
Oh, and considering his party's most recent botch-job (read it here: Muslim woman: Scarf kept her from seat near Obama) I'm not even in the mood to give him any free, positive publicity. During a televised rally in Detroit, Hebba Aref was denied a seat behind Obama because she wore a traditional Muslim head scarf. She was asked to step aside (and out of sight of camera lenses) because of how her appearance may be perceived by a "sensitive political climate." That's repulsive. That's a mockery of everything this campaign supposedly stands for. Suddenly all that talk of hope, change, and tolerance sounds like empty lip service. And I know this was no direct fault of Obama's -- his cronies were the ones to so tactlessly ask her to beat it -- but these campaign underlings are under HIS employ. And he is ultimately responsible for anything they do or say. He needs them to ship up or ship out. His name is "Barack Obama." We get that he's a Christian, but outside of legally changing it to "Micheal Smith," there's not much he can do to distance himself from the (partially) unfair stigma of Islam. I'm disappointed that he (or at the very least, those chosen to work for his party) are so easily swayed by peer pressure and guilt-by-association. It's like being ashamed to stand next to an overweight girl out of fear someone might mistake her for your girlfriend. It's petty and weak and paranoid and completely contradictive of everything they're trying to accomplish.
Michael Beasley and the NBA Draft
The NBA Draft is only a week away. Derrick Rose (the hometown Chicagoan) has already reportedly wowed the Bulls during his personal workout. Beasley is in Miami right now (read here: Michael Beasley coming today for workout), working out for the Heat. I say it's an open-and-shut case: the Bulls will take Rose #1 overall and we'll take Beasley #2 overall.
There isn't much more to say on the subject.
Those are the two best players available in the draft; we're the first two teams that select in the draft. Basic, undeniable logic tends to prevail every time.
For the next week, we're going to read about a lot of misdirection from team officials. General managers are going to say they really like Player A while secretly praying that they get Player B. This is what happens at this time of the year, it's just gamesmanship. Teams will do whatever it takes (misinformation, smoke screens, outright lying) to get who they want. When you're at the 11th hour, the only thing that could possibly happen next is whatever it is that you were waiting for all along. And that's where we're at with the NBA Draft. A lot of the later picks are still up in the air, but as a Heat fan, the only two that should matter, us and Chicago, are set. There's nothing left to do but actually draft Michael Beasley. So with that said, I won't type another word about him, not until he's a member of the Miami Heat. And then he can proceed to average 20 points, 10 rebounds, and win Rookie of the Year.
Gas prices
It's sort of become the non-talking point (read yet another gasoline article in today's Sun-Sentinel: Sales of premium gas plunge: 'Nobody can afford it'), something someone brings up to seem like they're up to date on current events, or perhaps just because they have sincerely run out of anything else to talk about. Fact is, gas prices are high. And they're going to get higher before they get lower. At this point, complaining about gas prices is about as effective as relevant as complaining about the chemical composition of water -- it's just become a fact of life now. If we want relief at the pumps, we'll have to actually do something to help ourselves. Take me for example; I drive the less-than-quarter-mile from my house to the local Publix; I drive out to go exercise, then drive all the way back; I drive my own car when meeting friends instead of car-pooling. I drive everywhere. I'm surprised I haven't driven to the mailbox yet. So rather than making the ineffective, offhand comment about gas prices being kind of high lately (no kidding), I can take an active role in fuel-consumption:
Walk whenever possible, or better yet, ride my bike. Change my air filters regularly, check my air pressure. Remove any heavy junk from trunk. Share driving responsibilities with friends, family, and coworkers, alternating for everyone's convenience. Buy a hybrid car. Run errands all at once, and in as close proximity to each other as possible. Instead of going out, enjoy a relaxing night at home.
We can't control OPEC's bureaucratic red tape, but we can control our daily routines. It's going to take an individual effort.
Not only should the subject of gas prices be barred from my blog, but from all casual conversation in general. It's become woefully unoriginal. I've realized that anyone who asks "what's the deal with gas these days?" isn't anyone worth speaking to. Out of all the other talking points, this one will be the easiest to abstain from.
So starting from here on out, I will no longer directly address these topics in my blog. Mum's the word. And this ban won't be permanent. Sooner or later, I will write about all of these topics again. But for the time being, I am retiring them. I don't feel I have anything else to add that won't be what I've already written about them, verbatim. Unless something really new and exciting happens, I'm done with that stuff. Consider them excommunicated. If all goes according to plan, these newly implemented blog guidelines will force me to come up with original thought.
Editor's Note: What I Had For Breakfast, What I Had For Lunch, and What I Had For Dinner will continue to be updated regularly.
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
What I Had For Dinner 6/18/08
A steak (9 oz. top sirloin) with half a rack of baby ribs, with mashed potatoes and sauteed onions & mushrooms on the side.
It was amazing. My steak was cooked perfectly (I requested medium rare at first, but then switched it to medium) and my ribs were tender. We also had the obligatory bloomin' onion thing as appetizer. And bread, of course.
The reason my family and I went to Longhorn's tonight was as a belated Father's Day dinner, but my Dad ended up paying. In our defense, skipping out on the bill wasn't premeditated.
It was amazing. My steak was cooked perfectly (I requested medium rare at first, but then switched it to medium) and my ribs were tender. We also had the obligatory bloomin' onion thing as appetizer. And bread, of course.
The reason my family and I went to Longhorn's tonight was as a belated Father's Day dinner, but my Dad ended up paying. In our defense, skipping out on the bill wasn't premeditated.
What I Had For Lunch 6/18/08
Monday, June 16, 2008
What I Had For Dinner 6/16/08
Shrimp simmered in coconut milk-flavored soup and served on top of white rice.
The only addition I could think of would be lemon grass. That would go a long way in brightening the soup. But other than that, it was great. The shrimp was perfectly cooked, the hot peppers were spicy but not oppressively spicy, and the coconut milk soup was very rich.
The only addition I could think of would be lemon grass. That would go a long way in brightening the soup. But other than that, it was great. The shrimp was perfectly cooked, the hot peppers were spicy but not oppressively spicy, and the coconut milk soup was very rich.
What I Had For Lunch 8/16/08
Pad Thai.
I'm predictable when I have Thai food. I always get it, but it's always good. Though I could've used a little more crushed up peanuts and bean sprouts.
And whenever I order out, I always look forward to seeing exactly how they'll mess up my name. This time, they wrote "Allen" on my receipt. Other times, it's "Eric" or "Erin." My favorite is when it's "Ellen."
I'm predictable when I have Thai food. I always get it, but it's always good. Though I could've used a little more crushed up peanuts and bean sprouts.
And whenever I order out, I always look forward to seeing exactly how they'll mess up my name. This time, they wrote "Allen" on my receipt. Other times, it's "Eric" or "Erin." My favorite is when it's "Ellen."
The Infomercial Told Me To Buy Gold
The infomercial I was watching early this morning told me to invest my money in gold. It's a wise investment, they say.
Now, I'm not that well-versed in economics. I know my Marxism and my Communist Manifesto. I know about the base and the superstructure, the proletariat and the bourgeoisie, the haves and the have-nots...all the philosophical, hyper-esoteric stuff. But that's really about it. I don't know of any practical use of economics. Specifically, I don't know anything about making my money grow into more money; I always associated that kind of thing with Business Majors. So when the infomercial told me that buying gold was in my best financial interest, I had little choice but to trust it.
The example they used seemed to make enough sense: the narrator had two piles of curreny, $50,000 in cash and $50,000 in gold coins. He reasoned that $50K in regular bills will still only be $50K. Even if it sits in a savings account, it's only going to accrue so many percentage points in a year's time...be it 1% or 2% or 7% or whatever. Now the $50K in gold coins, that has the potential to jump as high as -- depending on the market value for gold at any given time -- $160,000. Now I don't remember exactly how he arrived at that number (thinking back on it, it seems like an awfully arbitrary figure and I don't recall him giving any specific explanation why and how something like that would happen) but for someone who has as short an attention span for business-stuff as I do, all I cared about was how much I liked the sound of $160K. And the overall aesthetics of the presentation were very convincing: the narrator was standing in a bank vault; he had authentic-looking security guards standing behind him; and when the narrator picked up a handful of the gold coins and let them spill back out onto the pile, they made a very pleasing clinking sound, the sound a slot machine would make if you hit the jackpot.
Now, of course it's a scam; it wouldn't be an infomercial if it were legit. But it sounded like it made perfect sense, and that's what mattered the most to me at the time. If I didn't bother to take the time to stop and a) weigh the pros and cons, b) consider all the ramifications, and c) ask for advice from anyone who had half a clue about these kind of things, then yeah, it could actually be a good idea.
Also, I've always considered the idea of people owning and buying gold to be unfathomable. Obviously, lots of people have some gold -- in the form of earrings, watches, necklaces, teeth, what have you. But the thought of someone owning lots of gold, like a big stack of bars or a chest full of coins, seems so whimsically unreal to me. When I think of gold, I think of pirates and conquistadors and royalty and Indiana Jones...not normal, everyday people. It just feels like something I more closely associate with the pillaging & plundering past, rather than our credit-or-debit present.
And naturally, for anyone in and around my age group, simply mentioning the word "gold" immediately brings to mind Scrooge McDuck diving into his big pool of gold and swimming around in it during the opening theme song of every episode of Duck Tales.
Now, I'm not that well-versed in economics. I know my Marxism and my Communist Manifesto. I know about the base and the superstructure, the proletariat and the bourgeoisie, the haves and the have-nots...all the philosophical, hyper-esoteric stuff. But that's really about it. I don't know of any practical use of economics. Specifically, I don't know anything about making my money grow into more money; I always associated that kind of thing with Business Majors. So when the infomercial told me that buying gold was in my best financial interest, I had little choice but to trust it.
The example they used seemed to make enough sense: the narrator had two piles of curreny, $50,000 in cash and $50,000 in gold coins. He reasoned that $50K in regular bills will still only be $50K. Even if it sits in a savings account, it's only going to accrue so many percentage points in a year's time...be it 1% or 2% or 7% or whatever. Now the $50K in gold coins, that has the potential to jump as high as -- depending on the market value for gold at any given time -- $160,000. Now I don't remember exactly how he arrived at that number (thinking back on it, it seems like an awfully arbitrary figure and I don't recall him giving any specific explanation why and how something like that would happen) but for someone who has as short an attention span for business-stuff as I do, all I cared about was how much I liked the sound of $160K. And the overall aesthetics of the presentation were very convincing: the narrator was standing in a bank vault; he had authentic-looking security guards standing behind him; and when the narrator picked up a handful of the gold coins and let them spill back out onto the pile, they made a very pleasing clinking sound, the sound a slot machine would make if you hit the jackpot.
Now, of course it's a scam; it wouldn't be an infomercial if it were legit. But it sounded like it made perfect sense, and that's what mattered the most to me at the time. If I didn't bother to take the time to stop and a) weigh the pros and cons, b) consider all the ramifications, and c) ask for advice from anyone who had half a clue about these kind of things, then yeah, it could actually be a good idea.
Also, I've always considered the idea of people owning and buying gold to be unfathomable. Obviously, lots of people have some gold -- in the form of earrings, watches, necklaces, teeth, what have you. But the thought of someone owning lots of gold, like a big stack of bars or a chest full of coins, seems so whimsically unreal to me. When I think of gold, I think of pirates and conquistadors and royalty and Indiana Jones...not normal, everyday people. It just feels like something I more closely associate with the pillaging & plundering past, rather than our credit-or-debit present.
And naturally, for anyone in and around my age group, simply mentioning the word "gold" immediately brings to mind Scrooge McDuck diving into his big pool of gold and swimming around in it during the opening theme song of every episode of Duck Tales.
Saturday, June 14, 2008
What I Had For Breakfast 6/14/08
Friday, June 13, 2008
Tim Russert is a Dead Man
Tim Russert of NBC's 'Meet the Press' dies
I have since evolved into an accomplished student of literature, but when I first set foot onto a college campus (and for the subsequent 1.5 years thereafter) I was a student of journalism. Who, what, where, when and why were of great concern to me. So with Tim Russert passing away today, the Communications Minor in me mourns.
I'm pretentious; I like to support the theory that things that are inherently boring -- Leo Tolstoy, National Public Radio, bran flakes, C-SPAN, etc., etc. -- are also inherently entertaining. More often that not, I'm full of it -- War and Peace is a thousand pages too long; anything on NPR outside of David Sedaris' episodes of This American Life and the daily "celebrity birthday" reminders puts me to sleep; bran flakes are only edible with raisins and sugary sweet oat clusters; and C-SPAN shouldn't be allowed on television at all. But Meet the Press truly is one of those rare examples of something being good for you (it was educational and informative) and enjoyable (it was also witty and engaging).
Unlike Bill O'Reilly and other fellow talking head caricatures -- for the record, I do like The O'Reilly Factor a lot -- Russert never had to resort to fear-mongering, sensationalism, or grand-standing to keep viewers tuned in. The secret to his success was simply quality journalism. He built an entire career based primarily on honesty, cool-headed rationale, steady persistence, understated adamancy, and plain old likability.
It might be another station's tagline, but he actually was fair and balanced. And the good kind of bipartisanship, too; open-minded enough to consider both sides of a story, but hard-hitting enough to call someone out on their bullshit.
Whenever someone is universally renowned and respect, the way Russert is, that usually means one of two things: they're either extraordinarily great or extraordinarily average. The former is apropos here.
As it turns out, I feel more affected by Russert's passing today than I did by Bo Diddley's passing a couple weeks ago. I'm a little surprised by that.
And I've purposely avoided making any single blog entry of mine overly sentimental, so for fear of this one getting too sappy, I'll end it on a defiantly sobering note: the Buffalo Bills suck. Russert could've lived for another 100 years and they'd never win a Super Bowl. Scott Norwood watched Meet the Press every Sunday morning.
I have since evolved into an accomplished student of literature, but when I first set foot onto a college campus (and for the subsequent 1.5 years thereafter) I was a student of journalism. Who, what, where, when and why were of great concern to me. So with Tim Russert passing away today, the Communications Minor in me mourns.
I'm pretentious; I like to support the theory that things that are inherently boring -- Leo Tolstoy, National Public Radio, bran flakes, C-SPAN, etc., etc. -- are also inherently entertaining. More often that not, I'm full of it -- War and Peace is a thousand pages too long; anything on NPR outside of David Sedaris' episodes of This American Life and the daily "celebrity birthday" reminders puts me to sleep; bran flakes are only edible with raisins and sugary sweet oat clusters; and C-SPAN shouldn't be allowed on television at all. But Meet the Press truly is one of those rare examples of something being good for you (it was educational and informative) and enjoyable (it was also witty and engaging).
Unlike Bill O'Reilly and other fellow talking head caricatures -- for the record, I do like The O'Reilly Factor a lot -- Russert never had to resort to fear-mongering, sensationalism, or grand-standing to keep viewers tuned in. The secret to his success was simply quality journalism. He built an entire career based primarily on honesty, cool-headed rationale, steady persistence, understated adamancy, and plain old likability.
It might be another station's tagline, but he actually was fair and balanced. And the good kind of bipartisanship, too; open-minded enough to consider both sides of a story, but hard-hitting enough to call someone out on their bullshit.
Whenever someone is universally renowned and respect, the way Russert is, that usually means one of two things: they're either extraordinarily great or extraordinarily average. The former is apropos here.
As it turns out, I feel more affected by Russert's passing today than I did by Bo Diddley's passing a couple weeks ago. I'm a little surprised by that.
And I've purposely avoided making any single blog entry of mine overly sentimental, so for fear of this one getting too sappy, I'll end it on a defiantly sobering note: the Buffalo Bills suck. Russert could've lived for another 100 years and they'd never win a Super Bowl. Scott Norwood watched Meet the Press every Sunday morning.
What I Had For Lunch 6/13/08
What I Had For Breakfast 6/13/08
Strawberries & creme-flavored instant oatmeal and blueberry yogurt.
It was quick and easy, I liked it. But next time, I'd like to start cooking steel cut oatmeal. It's not as convenient as instant oatmeal, but it's so much better. The consistency is a lot thicker and heartier. It isn't just mush; the oats retain some of its integrity and you can actually chew on them before they melt in your mouth. It's just an overall more satisfying product. The extra preparation time is worth it.
It was quick and easy, I liked it. But next time, I'd like to start cooking steel cut oatmeal. It's not as convenient as instant oatmeal, but it's so much better. The consistency is a lot thicker and heartier. It isn't just mush; the oats retain some of its integrity and you can actually chew on them before they melt in your mouth. It's just an overall more satisfying product. The extra preparation time is worth it.
Thursday, June 12, 2008
What I Had For Dinner 6/12/08
A hot dog with ketchup, spicy brown mustard, and diced onions on top with potato chips on the side. And then the rest of my chicken burrito ultimo leftovers from Baja Fresh.
I was really in the mood for a hot dog the past day or two, so it was great to have one. I was starving by the time I ate, so I was glad they were Ball Park franks, which are typically thicker and meatier. I've been buying kettle-cooked chips lately, so having regular Lays potato chips was a nice change of pace; so much lighter-tasting. And my Baja Fresh leftovers had been in the fridge for a little while, so I figured I'd better get to it before it was too late. The rice and tortilla chips were already on the stale side, but that wasn't enough to ruin the burrito.
I was really in the mood for a hot dog the past day or two, so it was great to have one. I was starving by the time I ate, so I was glad they were Ball Park franks, which are typically thicker and meatier. I've been buying kettle-cooked chips lately, so having regular Lays potato chips was a nice change of pace; so much lighter-tasting. And my Baja Fresh leftovers had been in the fridge for a little while, so I figured I'd better get to it before it was too late. The rice and tortilla chips were already on the stale side, but that wasn't enough to ruin the burrito.
What I Had For Lunch 6/12/08
A quartered whole chicken simmered with slices of papaya simmered in a broth heavily flavored with freshly cracked black pepper, ginger, and scallions. Served over white rice. Also with a few pieces of pan-fried chicken.
It was great. With all the black pepper and ginger, the broth has a lot of flavor and depth to it. And since I'm on the verge of getting sick, it really warmed me up and helped clear my sinuses. The chicken in the broth was simmered perfectly, but I mostly stuck to the fried chicken. I was in the mood for something crispier and saltier. But the real highlight was the papaya. It was so ripe and sweet. And it adds so much to the visual presentation of the dish, being bright orange/pink.
It was great. With all the black pepper and ginger, the broth has a lot of flavor and depth to it. And since I'm on the verge of getting sick, it really warmed me up and helped clear my sinuses. The chicken in the broth was simmered perfectly, but I mostly stuck to the fried chicken. I was in the mood for something crispier and saltier. But the real highlight was the papaya. It was so ripe and sweet. And it adds so much to the visual presentation of the dish, being bright orange/pink.
What I Had For Breakfast 6/12/08
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)